Legal Opinion

United States v. Felix Esteban Thomas

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided April 26, 2006No. 05-14151PublishedCited by 97 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Opinion of the Court

MARCUS, Circuit Judge:

Felix Esteban Thomas appeals his 121-month sentence, which was imposed after he pled guilty to conspiracy to obstruct, delay, and affect commerce by robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1951(a). On appeal, Thomas raises the following claims: (1) the district court violated ex post facto and due process principles by sentencing him based on a retroactive application of the remedial opinion in United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005); (2) the district court violated the Fifth Amendment’s Indictment Clause, Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. United States v. John Kevin TalleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by97 opinions

  1. United States v. TomeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. Damon AmedeoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
  3. United States v. DocampoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
  4. United States v. BecklesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. Michael MartinCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API