Legal Opinion

Aluminum Co. of America v. Interstate Commerce Commission

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided May 10, 1985No. Nos. 83-1730 to 83-1732PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SCALIA.

SCALIA, Circuit Judge.

This case involves the Interstate Commerce Commission’s dismissal of a shippers’ complaint against certain rail rates, without considering whether the rates were just and reasonable, on grounds that the shippers had failed to establish the carriers’ market dominance over the transportation in question. Two shippers, The Aluminum Company of America and Reynolds Metals Co., and the Aluminum Association, a trade association with member shippers, appeal the decision as procedurally defective and as arbitrary or capricious…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Investment Company Institute v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve SystemCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  2. Philip Kerner v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
  3. Western Coal Traffic League and Its Members v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  4. Asphalt Roofing Manufacturers Association v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad Co., Eastern Railroads of the U. S., Fertilizer Institute, Intervenors. Southern Forest Products Association v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad Co., Eastern Railroads of the U. S., Fertilizer Institute, Intervenors. Sunkist Growers, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co., Fertilizer Institute, Intervenors. United States Beet Sugar Association v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Eastern Railroads, Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co., Fertilizer Institute, Intervenors. American Frozen Food Institute v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Eastern Railroads, Certain-Teed Products Corporation, Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co., Fertilizer Institute, Intervenors. Volkswagen of America, Inc. v. The United States of America and the Interstate Commerce Commission, Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co., Eastern Railroads, Fertilizer Institute, Intervenors. Ford Motor Company v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co., Fertilizer Institute, Intervenors. General Motors Corporation v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad Co., Fertilizer Institute, Intervenors. American Motors Corporation v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Fertilizer Institute, Intervenors. Western Growers Association v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Eastern Railroads Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co., Fertilizer Institute, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Aluminum Company of America v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Akron, Canton & Youngstown Railroad Co., Intervenors. The Aluminum Association, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Akron, Canton & Youngstown Railroad Co., Intervenors. Reynolds Metals Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Akron, Canton & Youngstown Railroad Co., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API