Legal Opinion

State v. Schlein

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided September 18, 1992No. 67,354; No. 67,355PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Vickers, J.:

This appeal involves two consolidated cases, K-66804 and K-66805. Both defendants-appellants, Charles J. Schlein and Robert W. Burgoon, appeal their convictions of one count each of gambling in violation of K.S.A. 21-4303(b). Schlein contends the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal because the State failed to prove he had entered a gambling place and contends the trial court erred in refusing his proposed jury instruction defining a gambling place. Burgoon *435likewise contends the State failed to prove he had entered a gambling place.

The facts herein are…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Martindale v. TennySupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  2. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
  3. State v. MorrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
  4. State v. CrichtonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1988
  5. State v. NixaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. SchleinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  2. State v. SchleinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API