Schisgal v. Wronkow
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment in favor of the defendant rendered by the justice of the Fourth District Court in an action for the - recovery of salary as superintendent -of the New York Watch Company.
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, P. J.
The action as originally stated in the oral pleadings was “ for wages,” but, by amendment, was changed to an action “ for salary as superintendent of the New York Watch Co.,” and the plaintiff sought to establish a claim upon the defendant, who was president of the company, for amounts due, as was contended, under a written agreement.of employment bv the company.
The plaintiff was employed by the company at $80 a month for a period of three years, with the right of the company to terminate the employment on giving two weeks’ notice. Such notice was given by the defendant, as president, on…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cahill Iron Works v. PembertonNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893