Legal Opinion

Colgate & Co. v. United Railways & Electric Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 25, 1929No. [No. 83, October Term, 1928.]PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUrner, J.

The motor-truck of the appellant was struck by an electric railway car of the appellee at the intersection of Gough and Bond Streets in the City of Baltimore. To recover for the damage to the truck this suit was brought, and from a judgment on a verdict for the railway company, directed to be rendered on the ground of contributory negligence on the part of the driver, the owner of the truck has appealed. An exception to that instruction raises the only question presented by the record.

The street ear was proceeding westwardly on Gough Street, and the truck was being driven southwardly on Bond…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United Railways & Electric Co. v. MantikCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1915
  2. United Railways & Electric Co. v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905
  3. Foos v. United Railways & Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1920
  4. Schell v. United Railways & Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1926

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Webb-Pepploe v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1930
  2. Crawford v. Baltimore Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  3. Harry T. Campbell & Sons v. United Railways & Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1931
  4. National Hauling Contractors Co. v. Baltimore Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
  5. McDowell, Pyle & Co. v. Magazine Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1933

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API