Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. Scott
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Hall, Judge.
1. The plaintiff contends that, since the garnishee’s answer only pleaded that it was not indebted to the defendant insured, it was error for the trial court to consider evidence supporting the defense that the insurer was not liable because the insured had failed to comply with conditions of the policy. The facts showing the insurer was not liable on its contract with the insured existed at the time the insurer filed its answer and the evidence of these facts was not disputed and was proof that the insurer garnishee was not indebted to the defendant. The statutory provision (Code…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sims T. V., Inc. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Polito v. GalluzzoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
- Cotton States Mutual Insurance v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Employees Assurance Society v. BushCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Estridge v. JankoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. J. B. Forrest & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Wolverine Insurance v. SorroughCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- H. Y. Akers & Sons, Inc. v. St. Louis Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Stonewall Insurance v. FaroneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- INDEPENDENT SCH. DIST. NO. 1, ETC. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.