Legal Opinion

Cummings v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 24, 1994No. CR 93-367PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jack Holt, Jr., Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from criminal convictions on charges of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver, fleeing, and refusal to submit. The appellant, James Quincy Cummings, was sentenced to thirty-five years for possession, thirty days for fleeing, and ninety days for refusal to submit, with the latter two sentences to run concurrently with the first.

On appeal, Cummings argues a single point for reversal, namely that the evidence produced by the State was insufficient to support a conviction for possession of a controlled substance with intent to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Middleton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  2. Rudd v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  3. Collins v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  4. Hayes v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  5. McArthur v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Chunestudy v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  2. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  3. Marshall v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  4. Dulaney v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  5. Gidron v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API