Legal Opinion
Bharatkumar Chaudhari v. Michael T. Rose, et al.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 26, 2026No. 3:26-cv-00242Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA BHARATKUMAR CHAUDHARI, : CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:26-CV-242 : Petitioner : (Judge Neary) : v. : : MICHAEL T. ROSE, et al.,1 : : Respondents : MEMORANDUM Bharatkumar Chaudhari, an immigration detainee in the custody of United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, seeks a writ of habeas corpus because he is being detained without a bond hearing solely because he entered the United States without authorization years earlier. The court joins hundreds of other judges around the country in holding that this form of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Rumsfeld v. PadillaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Jennings v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.