Saunders Contracting v. Clemens
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ERVIN, Judge.
The employer/carrier (e/e) appeals an award by the deputy commissioner (dc) of rehabilitation benefits pursuant to Section 440.49, Florida Statutes. We affirm.
The e/e argues on appeal that it was not given the opportunity to evaluate the necessity and appropriateness of the proposed treatment program, or to select the rehabilitation provider. We decline to address these issues on the merits, in that we find from our review of the record that the e/e did not preserve the issues it now complains of, and, therefore, has waived such questions on appeal. Prestressed Systems v. Goff,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sunland Hospital/State of Fla. v. GarrettDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Starks v. StarksDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Prestressed Systems v. GoffDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Nicholason v. BryantDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Florida Medical Center v. RenziDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
3Cited by4 opinions
- Holiday Inn v. SalleeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- A & J Tie Beam Service v. KendleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Pinnacle Constructors Group LLC v. SSC Tuscaloosa Apartments LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2023
- Wells v. WellsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026