People v. Kelly
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrero, J.), dated March 7, 2006, which, after a hearing to redetermine the defendant’s sex offender risk level pursuant to the stipulation of settlement in Doe v Pataki (3 F Supp 2d 456 [1998]), designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Supreme Court properly found that the defendant was a level three sex offender under the Sex Offender Registration Act (hereinafter SORA). The defendant’s challenge to the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Doe v. PatakiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- People v. AlstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. DuartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. SerranoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. VelezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. IorioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. RiveraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.