Legal Opinion

People v. Kelly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 18, 2007PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrero, J.), dated March 7, 2006, which, after a hearing to redetermine the defendant’s sex offender risk level pursuant to the stipulation of settlement in Doe v Pataki (3 F Supp 2d 456 [1998]), designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court properly found that the defendant was a level three sex offender under the Sex Offender Registration Act (hereinafter SORA). The defendant’s challenge to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Doe v. PatakiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
  2. People v. AlstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. DuartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. People v. SerranoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. People v. VelezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. People v. IorioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. People v. RiveraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API