Legal Opinion · Dissent

Malev Hungarian Airlines v. United Technologies International Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 5, 1992No. 665, Docket 91-7949Published

1Dissent

FEINBERG, Circuit Judge (dissenting):

The surest way to misconstrue a statute, one of our greatest federal judges said, is to apply it literally without regard to its purpose. See Cabell v. Markham, 148 F.2d 737, 739 (2d Cir.1945), aff’d, 326 U.S. 404, 66 S.Ct. 193, 90 L.Ed. 165 (1945). That, I fear, is what the majority has done here, thereby creating a precedent that bodes ill for a federal judicial system that is struggling to stay afloat. This appears to be the only reported decision requiring a United States court generally to supervise imposition of United States procedures *103with respect…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Cabell v. MarkhamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  3. Markham v. CabellSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. American Express Warehousing, Ltd. v. Transamerica Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  5. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,186 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Bausch & Lomb Incorporated and Daniel G. SchumanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API