Legal Opinion

Burnett v. Hill

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided January 9, 1996No. 94-2011PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

Steven Burnett asks us to review whether a summons served by publication pursuant to §§ 801.02(3), and 801.11(l)(c), Stats., must be authenticated to acquire personal jurisdiction over a defendant. The trial court granted Claude Hill's motion to dismiss Burnett's negligence action with prejudice because Burnett failed to authenticate the summons he served by publication. The trial court ruled that this failure was a fundamental error that deprived the court of personal jurisdiction over Hill. We agree with the trial court and affirm.

The following facts are undisputed. In October 1993, Burnett…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. American Family Mutual Insurance v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Norton v. KearneyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
  5. Sacotte v. Ideal-Werk Krug & Priester MacHinen-fabrikWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Burnett v. HillWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API