Legal Opinion

In Re the Care & Treatment of Foster

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided March 18, 2005No. 91,324PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Malone, J.:

Randy A. Foster appeals his commitment under the Kansas Sexually Violent Predators Act (the Act), K.S.A. 59-29a01 et seq. Foster claims that the trial court erred in instructing the jury, that the trial court erred in admitting into evidence the evaluation report from the Lamed State Security Hospital (Larned), and that the State committed prosecutorial misconduct in its opening statement. We affirm.

We will- not recite Foster’s entire history of sexual behavior and sexual offenses as the history is unnecessary to-address the issues, raised in this appeal. In 1993, Foster was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  2. State v. MonclaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  3. State v. PuckettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  4. State v. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  5. In Re the Care & Treatment of HaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Louk v. CormierWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. In Re the Care & Treatment of FosterSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  3. In Re the Care & Treatment of WardCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2006
  4. In Re the Care & Treatment of FosterCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2005
  5. Louk v. CormierWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API