Legal Opinion · Dissent
Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Parsons
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided September 7, 1962No. 13701Published
1DissentCastle, Circuit Judge
I would deny the petition for mandamus. In my view of the matter the contested issues presented for determination are:
“(1) Whether the state court’s determination, made under the forum non conveniens doctrine, estops Filbrun from maintaining his action in a court sitting in Cook County, Illinois, and requires the District Court to allow the petitioner’s motion to transfer the action to the Western District of Michigan, Southern Division; and if it does not,
“(2) Whether, on the facts and circumstances presented, it is clearly established that the respondent’s denial of the transfer sought…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Norwood v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad Company v. IgoeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
- Cotton v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
- Chicago, R.I. & P.R. Co. v. IgoeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
- John F. Blaski v. Honorable Julius J. Hoffman, United States District JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.