Clifton Ervin v. State of Indiana

OPINION

BAKER, Judge.

Appellant-defendant Clifton Ervin brings this interlocutory appeal, challenging the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress. Specifically, Ervin argues that although the trial court properly granted a portion of his motion to suppress, it erred in determining that only the evidence seized from the moment that an off-duty police officer ordered him to return tó his vehicle until uniformed on-duty police officers arrived at the scene should be suppressed. In other words, Ervin claims that the trial court should have issued an order “prohibiting the State from…