Legal Opinion
Heydemann v. Westinghouse Electric Mfg. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 6, 1936No. 64PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is from a judgment dismissing the amended complaint upon a motion by i the defendant for judgment on the pleadings. The amended complaint alleged that the plaintiff Natalie G. Heydemann, ,as successor in interest of her deceased husband, was the owner of a cause of action against Russian Electric Company, a Russian corporation, to recover the sum of $79,251.09- for services and disbursements. Heydemann,. and his widow were at all times domiciled in Germany and it was not alleged that the Russian Company was at any time engaged in business in the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Galpin v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Harris v. BalkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Harvey v. TylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- Plimpton v. . BigelowNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dorr-Oliver, Inc. v. Willett AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Western Urn Manufacturing Company and Farmer Brothers Company v. American Pipe and Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
- American Fidelity Fire Insurance v. Paste-Ups Unlimited, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Patel Cotton Co. v. The Steel TravelerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
- Christmas v. BuckleyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.