Robinson v. State

on appellant’s motion for rehearing.

MARTIN, Judge.

A reconsideration of the record convinces us that the recitals of Bill of Exception No. 1 are sufficient to show that the affidavits attached to the motion for a new trial constituted all the evidence heard pro and con with reference to the issue made regarding appellant’s motion for continuance and the same will now be considered by us on its merits.

Appellant was indicted in two counts, the first charging the unlawful possession of mash for manufacturing intoxicating liquor and the second charging the unlawful possession of a still for said…