Legal Opinion
Timothy Kelly v. Carl Mace
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided July 22, 2014No. 13-4068UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STRANCH, Circuit Judge.
Timothy and Sharon Kelly, residents of Pennsylvania, appeal from the decision of *492the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP) that reversed a favorable decision the Kel-lys obtained in the Ohio Chapter 18 bankruptcy case of the debtors, Carl and Cindy Mace. The Kellys filed timely proof of an unsecured claim, to which the Maces objected. After an evidentiary hearing, the bankruptcy court found that Timothy Kelly was a more credible witness than Carl Mace. The court found that Carl Mace made and breached an enforceable oral agreement with Timothy Kelly to relieve the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- 26 Collier bankr.cas.2d 663, Bankr. L. Rep. P 74,447 in Re Allegheny International, Inc. J. Daniel SnyderCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- In Re Thomas Francis Barrett, Jr., Debtor. Thomas Francis Barrett, Jr. v. Educational Credit Management CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Pennsy Supply, Inc. v. American Ash Recycling Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Mitan v. DuvalCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Mountain Properties, Inc. v. Tyler Hill Realty Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Darryl S BairUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2019
- In re: Melissa TeschUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2021
- Louis Thomas Bauer, Jr.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024