Legal Opinion

Crescent Textiles, Inc. v. Pacolet Manufacturing Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 2, 1963No. 39991PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Russell, Judge.

1. Generally, the authority of a court to issue and serve process is restricted to the territory of the State where issued, and the court has no power to require persons not within its territory to appear and answer to its judgments. Milner v. Gatlin, 139 Ga. 109, 113 (2) (76 SE 860); Briggs v. Briggs, 207 Ga. 614 (63 SE2d 371).

2. Where, in an action on a foreign judgment, the law of the foreign state is not pleaded, it is presumed to be the same as the common law as interpreted by the courts of this State. In such a case, where the foreign judgment is attached to and made a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Milner v. GatlinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  2. Callan Court Co. v. Citizens & Southern National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  3. Henry & Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  4. Lurey v. JOS. S. COHEN & SONS CO. INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  5. Greenfield v. CHRONICLE PRINTING COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. West Point-Pepperell, Inc. v. Multi-Line Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1973
  2. Pacolet Manufacturing Co. v. Crescent Textiles, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1963
  3. Crescent Textiles, Inc. v. Pacolet Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API