State ex rel. Commissioners of the Sinking Fund v. Brown
Ohio Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceTaft, J.
The question now raised, relative to the condensed text of Section 2e of Article VIII of the Constitution as it appeared on the November 1955 ballot, might have been raised by contesting, in the manner provided for in Section 3515.08 et seq., Bevised Code, the portion of the election wherein the electors apparently approved that proposed con*76stitutional provision. If that question had been so raised, I have grave doubt whether this court could reasonable have sustained the validity of the approval of that constitutional provision by the electors. See Beck v. City of Cincinnati, 162 Ohio St.,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miller v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court · 1846
- Jordan v. Breece Manufacturing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1914
- Durbin v. Barber & BarneyOhio Supreme Court · 1846
- Fenwick v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1929
- State Ex Rel. Shriver v. HayesOhio Supreme Court · 1947
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.