Legal Opinion
In Re Frost
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided February 10, 1989No. Bankruptcy 2-87-02556PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON APPLICATION TO MODIFY PLAN
BARBARA J. SELLERS, Bankruptcy Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the motion of debtors Harold and Catherine Frost, seeking to modify their Chapter 13 plan. The proposed modification was opposed by Atlantic Financial Federal (“Atlantic”) and was heard by the Court.
The Court has jurisdiction in this matter under 28 U.S.C. § 1334(b) and the General Order of Reference previously entered in this district. This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A), (B), and (L).
The debtors filed a Chapter 13 petition and plan with this Court on June 10,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re SimpkinsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1982
- Caster v. United States (In Re Caster)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- In Re NealUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1981
- Matter of AbercrombieUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1984
- In Re MarxUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- In Re: Sahnica Denise Nolan, Debtor. Chrysler Financial Corporation v. Sahnica Denise NolanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- In Re Estel Ray Hougland, Ruth Evelyn Hougland, Debtors. Estel Ray Hougland Ruth Evelyn Hougland v. The Lomas & Nettleton Company, Creditor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- In Re Danny L. Hart and Joanne E. Hart, Debtors. Eastland Mortgage Co. v. Danny L. Hart and Joanne E. HartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- In Re: Matthew Adkins, Debtor. David Wm. Ruskin, Trustee v. Daimlerchrysler Services North America, L.L.C., (Creditor)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- In Re CoffmanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2002
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.