Cabral v. Willard
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WAXSE, United States Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant Willard’s Motion for Dismissal (doc. 24) and Motion to Amend his Answer (doc. 25). Defendant Willard moves for dismissal of this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because Plaintiff has not alleged a matter in controversy exceeding the sum or value of $75,000, as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1332. All parties have consented to the authority of the undersigned magistrate judge to exercise jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). For the reasons set forth below, Defendant Willard’s Motion…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Horton v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Larry Laughlin v. Kmart CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Marshall Huffman Virginia Newton v. Saul Holdings Limited Partnership, a Maryland Limited PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Renetta M. Miera v. Dairyland Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Orchestrate HR, Inc. v. Blue Cross Blue Shield KansasDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2019