Legal Opinion · Dissent

Iowa National Bank v. Stewart

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 26, 1930No. Nos. 39843, 39844Published

1DissentWagner, J.

The minority of the court cannot concur in the reasoning of the majority, nor in the result reached. Since we would reverse, it will be necessary, in this dissenting opinion, to consider the various propositions urged in argument by the respective parties, which we will now proceed to do.

It was stipulated in the trial court that the above-entitled causes should not be consolidated, but that the testimony should be taken at one time, and in so far as applicable, the same should apply to all of said causes. It will be observed at the outset that the plaintiffs include two national banks, and…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Reagan v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Sioux City Bridge Co. v. Dakota CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Township of WakefieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  4. Greene v. Louisville & Interurban RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. Cummings v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1880

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API