Legal Opinion

Turk v. Mangum

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided July 17, 2017No. Civil Action No. H-15-1003PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DAVID HITTNER, United States District Judge

Pending before the Court are the Opposed Motion of Defendant Mangum for DNA Testing to Discover Plaintiff Turk’s Standing (Document No. 102) and Plaintiffs Amended Response to Defendant’s Motion for Blood/DNA Testing and FRCP Rule 11 Motion for Sanctions for Frivolous Filing (Document No. 106). Having considered the motions, submissions, and applicable law, the Court determines the motion for sanctions should be denied and the motion for DNA testing granted. The Court further determines that a hearing should be set to determine whether Plaintiff…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Austin Nursing Center, Inc. v. LovatoTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Ann Rhyne v. Henderson CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  3. Shepherd v. LedfordTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Brown v. Edwards Transfer Co., Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Pluet v. FrasierCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bage v. Galveston County DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN REMANDED.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2022
  2. Gonzales v. City of AustinDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2024
  3. Tate, Patrick S. v. Doe, JohnDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API