Audia v. Hannold

OPINION

Opinion By

Justice LANG-MIERS.

This is an appeal from a take-nothing judgment entered in appellant Christopher Audia’s personal-injury lawsuit against ap-pellees Kenneth and Janice Hannold. On appeal, Audia complains that the district court violated his rights under the Texas Constitution by empaneling a six-person jury because “[t]he plain, literal language of Article V, Section 13 requires twelve jurors be empaneled in any civil matter in a Texas District Court.” We conclude that Audia’s complaint was not preserved for appellate review. As a result, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.