Legal Opinion
Michigan United Conservation Clubs v. City of Cadillac
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided January 16, 1974No. Docket 16406PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtR. B. Burns, P. J.
Plaintiffs filed suit against the defendant for a declaratory judgment, asking that the court declare defendant’s ordinance 674, § 6 invalid. The trial court held that the ordinance was valid and granted a judgment for the defendant. We affirm.
Cadillac ordinance 674, § 6, reads as follows:
"Firearms; discharge prohibited. It shall be unlawful for any person to discharge any firearm, gun, pistol, revolver, airgun, air pistol, or any other instrument producing a like effect and noise, or shoot a bow and arrow, within the city limits except in lawful defense of his person or property.”
Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. PennockMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
3Cited by2 opinions
- Czymbor’s Timber, Inc v. City of SaginawMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
- Gray v. Wayne CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986