Legal Opinion

Michigan United Conservation Clubs v. City of Cadillac

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 16, 1974No. Docket 16406PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtR. B. Burns, P. J.

Plaintiffs filed suit against the defendant for a declaratory judgment, asking that the court declare defendant’s ordinance 674, § 6 invalid. The trial court held that the ordinance was valid and granted a judgment for the defendant. We affirm.

Cadillac ordinance 674, § 6, reads as follows:

"Firearms; discharge prohibited. It shall be unlawful for any person to discharge any firearm, gun, pistol, revolver, airgun, air pistol, or any other instrument producing a like effect and noise, or shoot a bow and arrow, within the city limits except in lawful defense of his person or property.”

Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. PennockMichigan Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Czymbor’s Timber, Inc v. City of SaginawMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Gray v. Wayne CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API