Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Hall

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1897PublishedCited by 1 opinion

" Motion for leave to withdraw money deposited as security -for costs.

1Opinion of the CourtKellogg, J.

It appears that an order was made in this action in June, 1895, requiring, the plaintiff, asm nonresident, to file an undertaking for costs, or deposit .$250, under sections 3268’ and *2793272 of the Code, and in compliance with such order the plaintiff paid into court the $250.

That thereafter a trial was had, which resulted in a judgment in favor of plaintiff.

That the time allotted in which to appeal from such judgment has not expired, and counsel for defendant in open court declares his intention to appeal therefrom.

Motion is now made by plaintiff’s counsel for leave to withdraw the money…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fuller Buggy Co. v. CudneyNew York Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API