Legal Opinion
Hughes River Watershed Conservancy v. Johnson
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided January 13, 1999No. 98-2134PublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge HAMILTON wrote the opinion, in which Judge NIEMEYER and Judge HERLONG joined.
OPINION
HAMILTON, Circuit Judge:
The Hughes Rivershed Water Conservancy and a number of other environmental groups (collectively referred to as HRWC) appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Army Corps of Engineers and the Natural Resources Conservation Service (the Agencies), following our remand of the case with instructions to direct the Agencies to fully comply with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42 U.S.C. §§ 4321-70d (NEPA). See…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition v. Aracoma Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
- Webster v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- Town of Winthrop v. AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- National Audubon Society v. Department Of The NavyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
- Audubon Naturalist Society of the Central Atlantic States, Inc. v. United States Department of TransportationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2007
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.