Legal Opinion
Page v. Schweiker
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 2, 1983No. Civ. A. 82-1338PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
CALDWELL, District Judge.
Before us for disposition is defendant’s motion to dismiss or, alternatively, for summary judgment. For the reasons discussed hereinafter, the motion is denied.
I. Background
On October 27, 1982, plaintiff filed her complaint against the Secretary of Health and Human Services challenging the procedure utilized by the Social Security Administration (SSA) to recoup purported over-payments from Supplemental Security Income (SSI) beneficiaries. 2 Plaintiff sought to bring a class action on behalf of “every SSI beneficiary within the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Page v. SchweikerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Page v. HecklerDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
- Lugo Ex Rel. Lugo v. SchweikerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
- Bronstein v. ApfelDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2001
- Page v. SchweikerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.