Ætna Mills v. Inhabitants of Brookline
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtEndicott, J.
This case arises upon a statute similar to those recently passed upon by this court in the cases of Bailey v. Woburn, 126 Mass. 416, and Ætna Mills v. Waltham, 126 Mass. 422; and the facts disclosed in the bill of exceptions do not so materially differ from the facts presented in those cases as to distinguish this case, and to require us to sustain the exceptions taken by the respondent.
In Bailey v. Woburn, the town had taken land on the border of Horn Pond, and constructed a water-gallery and other works *70for supplying its inhabitants with water from the pond, under the St. of 1871, a. S07;…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wilson v. City of New BedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Bailey v. Inhabitants of WoburnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
- Ætna Mills v. Inhabitants of WalthamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
3Cited by14 opinions
- Attorney General v. Jamaica Pond Aqueduct Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
- City of Emporia v. SodenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
- Smith v. City of BrooklynAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- Cowdrey v. Inhabitants of WoburnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
- Newton v. City of NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.