Norton v. Spencer
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM REGARDING PETITIONER’S FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO DISMISS (Docket Nos. 1, 20)
PONSOR, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Habeas corpus petitioner Roger Norton (“Norton” or “petitioner”) argues that he has been wrongly imprisoned following his conviction on four counts of indecent assault and battery on a person under the age of fourteen. His arguments can be divided into two categories: (1) that the prosecution’s failure to disclose exculpatory evidence violated his rights as set forth in Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963); and…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Norton v. SpencerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003