Legal Opinion

Norton v. Spencer

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided March 25, 2003No. CIV.A.01-30070-MAPPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM REGARDING PETITIONER’S FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO DISMISS (Docket Nos. 1, 20)

PONSOR, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Habeas corpus petitioner Roger Norton (“Norton” or “petitioner”) argues that he has been wrongly imprisoned following his conviction on four counts of indecent assault and battery on a person under the age of fourteen. His arguments can be divided into two categories: (1) that the prosecution’s failure to disclose exculpatory evidence violated his rights as set forth in Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963); and…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Norton v. SpencerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API