Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Holt

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 22, 1983No. 39436PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Clarke, Justice.

This is a habeas corpus case involving whether a plea of guilty was voluntarily and intelligently entered and whether the defendant received effective legal representation. The trial court denied the writ of habeas corpus and we granted a certificate of probable cause to appeal. We now affirm.

Carroll pled guilty to the offense of being an habitual violator. OCGA § 40-5-58 (Code Ann. § 68B-308). Under the habitual violator statute it is a felony to operate a motor vehicle after having received notice that the perpetrator has been determined to be an habitual violator for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Weaver v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  3. Brown v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Loyd v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
  2. Green v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2024
  3. Lawson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  4. Stevens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  5. Harper v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API