Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Haragan v. Harris
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided October 21, 1998No. 24365PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McKINNON, Justice.
{1} Petitioners are elected officers from various counties who happened to be at midterm on the effective date of a salary increase. They, along with all elected county officers in their respective counties, were granted a salary increase by their local county commissions in accordance with NMSA 1978, § 4-44-12.3 (1991). All of the pay raises were to be effective on January 1, 1995, without regard to whether an officer was in midterm or starting a new term. See id. Because many elected county officers serve staggered terms, this effective date fell in the midst of a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pollack v. MontoyaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1951
- State ex rel. Gilbert v. Board of Com'rsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
- Blackburn v. Board of County Commissioners of Park CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 1951
- Board of County Commissioners of Greer Co. v. HenrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- NEW ENERGY ECONOMY, INC. v. ShoobridgeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
- Johnson v. ShulerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2001
- In Re Extradition of MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2001
- Janson v. North Valley HospitalCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
- State Ex Rel. Haragan v. HarrisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998