Legal Opinion

Hastings Pork v. Johanneson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1983No. Civ. 10402PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEDERSON, Justice.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment enforcing a settlement agreement. We affirm the judgment.

Hastings Pork commenced an action against Johanneson and Olson seeking to recover $157,812.50 plus interest. The basis for the claim was not discussed. Before the case could come to trial, the parties entered into a settlement agreement1 which provid*804ed for procedures whereby Johanneson and Olson were to convey mineral interests having an aggregate fair market value of $200,000 to Hastings and, in return, Hastings agreed to dismiss the lawsuit. The settlement agreement further…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sorlie v. NessNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Benson County Cooperative Credit Union v. Central Livestock Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Bohlman v. Big River Oil CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Swan v. Great Northern Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Coulter v. CoulterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. BertramNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Bragg v. BURLINGTON RESOURCES OIL & GAS CO. LPNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Agra-By-Products, Inc. v. Agway, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. WanzekNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State of Minn. v. SnellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API