State v. Christie
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.
Michael Clayton Christie was convicted by a jury of robbery. At the close of the state’s case, Christie moved for a directed verdict, which was denied. On appeal, he contends as a matter of law the state has not proven his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. We find this contention not well taken.
Christie has also applied to this court for leave to file a motion for new trial in the superior court based on newly discovered evidence. Permission to file a motion for new trial in the superior court is granted on the condition Christie can justify his failure to file his motion pursuant to the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Carter v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- State v. ReynoldsWashington Supreme Court · 1958
- State v. AdamsWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- State v. RobinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1962
- Haaga v. Saginaw Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
- State v. HobbsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975