Legal Opinion

Clinton Charles Taliaferro v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 19, 1972No. 71-2756PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Clinton Taliaferro appeals a district court order denying relief sought by him under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 upon the ground that his plea of guilty to a charge of possession of counterfeit currency (18 U.S.C. § 472) had not been voluntarily made as required by Fed.R.Crim.P. 11. The district court opinion is reported as Taliaferro v. United States, 330 F.Supp. 408 (N.D.Cal.1971). We are quite convinced that the district court’s findings and order are not clearly erroneous, Conley v. United States, 407 F.2d 45 (9th Cir.), cert. denied 396 U.S. 853, 90 S.Ct. 113, 24 L.Ed.2d 102 (1969), and affirm for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wayne E. Conley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  2. Taliaferro v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1971

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Eathorne v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API