Legal Opinion

Alabama ex rel. Siegelman v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided August 23, 1990No. 88-7523PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDMONDSON, Circuit Judge:

Pursuant to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, 42 U.S.C. §§ 6901-6992k (1982 & Supp. V 1987) (“RCRA”), the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) issued a final operating permit for the nation’s largest hazardous waste management facility, located at Emelle, Alabama. We are asked to decide whether EPA’s procedures in issuing the permit were sufficient to exempt EPA from performing an environmental impact study in compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 4321-4370b (1982 & Supp. V 1987) (“NEPA”). The answer is “Yes.” We are…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Busic v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water v. Natural Resources Defense CounCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. Kootenai Tribe of Idaho v. VenemanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. Prutehi Litekyan: Save Ritidian v. United States Department of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
  4. State of Alabama v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  5. Gottesman v. FischerDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API