Legal Opinion

Ike's Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 13, 1912No. Appeal, No. 195PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal, No. 195, Jan. T., 1911, by Emma G. Ike, from decree of O. O. Blair Co., No. 463, of 1901, dismissing exceptions to auditor’s report and in refusing to award an issue. Exceptions to auditor’s report. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the case. Errors assigned were (1) refusing to award an issue and (2-6) in overruling exceptions to auditor’s report.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The assignments of error relate to the refusal of the court to award an issue to determine the validity of notes on which the administrator claimed to recover from the decedent’s estate and to the confirmation of *430the report of the auditor allowing the claim. The right to an issue, under the facts shown, was considered by this court on an appeal by the same appellant, in a proceeding that grew out of the application by the administrator for an order to sell the real estate of the decedent for the payment of debts. In dismissing the appeal it was said, “The issue asked for was not of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kates's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  2. Ike's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Snyder EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Kvist's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  3. Finch's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API