Legal Opinion
Roger Edwards, LLC v. Fiddes & Son Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided February 8, 2006No. 05-1679PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOUDIN, Chief Judge.
Appellant Roger Edwards, LLC (“Roger Edwards”), a Maine limited liability company, seeks reversal of Rule 11 sanctions, Fed.R.Civ.P. 11, imposed on it and its counsel by the magistrate judge who tried the underlying case with the consent of the parties. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1) (2000). This is the third appeal filed in this case by Roger Edwards. 1 This decision also resolves a motion by appellee Fiddes & Son, Ltd. (“Fiddes”) requesting appellate sanctions under Fed. R.App. P. 38, on the ground that Roger Edwards’ second appeal — No. 05-1306, appealing the denial of Rule…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Anne Anderson v. Cryovac, Inc., Anne Anderson v. Beatrice Foods Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Daigle v. Maine Medical Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Cronin v. Town of AmesburyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Citibank Global Markets, Inc. v. Rodriguez SantanaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Lamboy-Ortiz v. Ortiz-VelezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- Baella-Silva v. HulseyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Armisted v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Eldridge v. Gordon Brothers Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.