Pulaski v. Dakota Financial, LLC (In re Pulaski)
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
THOMAS S. UTSCHIG, Bankruptcy Judge.
The Pulaskis filed this adversary proceeding in hopes of avoiding the defendant’s mortgage on their homestead. The claims asserted in their adversary complaint primarily arise under Wisconsin law rather than the bankruptcy code, and include attacks on the validity of the mortgage due to unconscionability, lack of consideration, mistake, misrepresentation, unjust enrichment, breach of contract, and breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing. In response, in the joint pretrial statement and at the initial pretrial conference, the defendant raised…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Stern v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Katchen v. LandySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of America v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Langenkamp v. CulpSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rinaldi v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2013
- Schmid v. Bank of America, N.A. (In re Schmid)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2013
- Schmid v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2013
- Desmond v. NgDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
- Johnson v. RFF Family Partnership, LP (In re Johnson)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.