Legal Opinion
In the Interest of J. C.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 4, 2011No. A10A2124PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARNES, Presiding Judge.
Sixteen-year-old J. C. was adjudicated delinquent for shoplifting, and argues on appeal that the State’s evidence against him was insufficient because it was based on inadmissible hearsay and that the juvenile court judge did not comply with the requirements of OCGA § 15-11-21 (e) in ruling upon J. C.’s request for rehearing. For the reasons that follow, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and *337remand with direction.
In reviewing a delinquency adjudication, “we construe the evidence and every inference from the evidence in favor of the juvenile court’s adjudication to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- K-Mart Corp. v. CokerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Hurston v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
- Stovall v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In the Interest of H. A.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- In the Interest of Q. S.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- In the Interest of M. J.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- In Re HACourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- In Re JcCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.