Legal Opinion
Hub Steel & Iron Works, Inc. v. Dyer
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided June 28, 1933PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.
The defendants John E. Dyer and Joseph F. Dyer contracted with the defendant city for the construction of a boiler plant in a jail. Under G. L. c. 149, § 29, the city obtained security in the form of a bond, with. a surety company as surety, for the payment by the contractors and subcontractors for labor and materials. ' The- contract provided for the payment monthly by the city to the contractors of eighty-five per cent of the value of the work done during the month, and contained this provision: “Article III. The Contractor further agrees that he will pay all bills for labor and materials…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Snyder v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
- Central Supply Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Dyer v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- McClintic-Marshall Co. v. City of New BedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Cunningham v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Massachusetts Gas & Electric Light Supply Co. v. Rugo Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- Crane Co. v. PARK CONSTRUCTION CO. INC.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
- Metropolitan Pipe & Supply Co. v. D'Amore Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Singarella v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
- Duteau v. SalvucciMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.