Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Morris (In re Morris)

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided January 15, 1992No. 90-7632Published

1DissentClark, Senior Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s conclusion that the district court erred in finding that the bankruptcy court did not have jurisdiction to try the adversary proceeding after having closed the underlying Chapter 11 proceeding. That pending proceeding was the only source of the bankruptcy court’s jurisdiction to try this state court action in the first place. The error would be more palatable to me if the majority had coupled its reversal with a holding that the judgment would only be reinstated upon the debtor’s moving for a reopening of the underlying Chapter 11 proceeding pursuant…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Stardust Inn, Inc. v. Doshi (In Re Stardust Inn, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Auto Auction, Inc. v. Pocklington (In Re Pocklington)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1982
  3. In Re Smith.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  4. Winston & Strawn v. Kelly (In Re Churchfield Management & Investment Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
  5. Gagel v. Kingston-Greene Partners, Ltd. (In Re GWF Investment, Ltd.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API