Legal Opinion

Little v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 11, 1995No. 95-543PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Although appellant’s motion for postconviction relief was sworn to, the facts in support of the motion were set out in a separate memorandum of law which was not under oath. We find the motion to be facially insufficient to support the granting of any relief as all matters of record were alleged in the unsworn memorandum of law. Jones v. State, 637 So.2d 999 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Rackley v. State, — So.2d— [1995 WL 437266], 20 Fla.L. Weekly D1716 (Fla. 1st DCA Jul. 26, 1995). Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s ruling. This disposition is without prejudice to appellant’s right to re*1380submit…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schofield v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  2. Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  3. Rackley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Little v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API