Legal Opinion

Jacobs v. Healey Ford-Subaru, Inc., No. Cv90 0031301s (Feb. 7, 1996)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided February 7, 1996No. CV90 0031301SUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: ACCEPTANCE OF REPORT OF ATTORNEY TRIAL REFEREE The present action arises out of a sale of a motor vehicle by the defendant to the plaintiff. As a result of prior hearings, the Supreme Court has determined that where there is a violation of General Statutes § 42-98 of the Retail Installment Sales Financing Act (RISFA) and General Statutes § 42a-9-504 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), the plaintiff is entitled to damages under both statutory schemes. See Jacobs v. HealeyFord-Subaru, Inc.,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Borkowski v. BorkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  2. De Luca v. Board of Park CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
  3. Jacobs v. Healey Ford-Subaru, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  4. Atlas Credit Corp. v. DolbowSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  5. Stelco Industries, Inc. v. ZanderConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API