Legal Opinion

Mainland v. Alfred Brown Company

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1969No. 5839PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Thompson, J.:

This is an action by an electrical subcontractor against the general contractor to recover the value of electrical equipment and materials delivered to the job site and destroyed by fire. Neither party was responsible for the fire. The materials so delivered had not been installed in the building under construction. The written subcontract obligated the subcontractor to furnish and install all electrical work for the building for a stipulated price and provided for progressive monthly payments of 90 percent of the work performed in the preceding month…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Aced v. Hobbs-Sesack Plumbing Co.California Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Walden v. BackusNevada Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Rino v. Statewide Plumbing & Heating Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Collins v. POSTOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Authorized Supply Co. of Arizona v. Swift & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hermann v. Varco-Pruden BuildingsNevada Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Air Heaters, Inc. v. Johnson Electric, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Meyers v. Henderson Construction Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  4. Audio Visual Artistry v. Stephen TanzerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2012
  5. Lincoln Welding Works, Inc. v. RamirezNevada Supreme Court · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API