Legal Opinion

Lanier v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided August 26, 2004No. A04A1662PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blackburn, Presiding Judge.

Following his conviction of felony theft by shoplifting 1 and the denial of his motion for new trial, Eric Lanier appeals, contending that: (1) the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction because the State failed both to produce evidence or testimony from the owner of the merchandise that he deprived the owner of possession, and also to prove the value of the merchandise taken; and, (2) the State improperly introduced evidence of his character into the trial. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

1. Lanier contends that the evidence was insufficient…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Dillard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  3. Mims v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  4. Gerdine v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  5. Pippin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Evans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  2. James v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  3. Harden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  4. Baughcum v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  5. Lockridge v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API