Legal Opinion
Moore v. Batten
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 15, 1893PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Motion for a new trial on case and exceptions. The opinion gives the facts.
1Opinion of the CourtHaight, J.
This case has been twice tried. The first trial resulted in a nonsuit, but it was sent back for a new trial by the General Term. Moore v. Batten, 14 N. Y. St. Repr. 191.
Upon the second trial a verdict was directed in favor of the plaintiff for the value of the'goods.
Clinton E. Brush and Seeley B. Brush were dry goods merchants doing business under the firm name of C. E. Brush & Bro., in Toronto, Canada. On the 16th day of December, 1884, they made a general assignment to one Clarkson, for the benefit of creditors, of all of their copartnership and individual property, including the household…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Grumley v. WebbSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
- Ford v. . WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
- Roberts v. . TobiasNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Baker v. FreemanNew York Supreme Court · 1832
- Sprague v. BrownWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bernstein v. CahenAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1905