Luman v. State

Conviction for receiving stolen property; punishment, three years in the penitentiary.

Upon an inspection of the record it appears that no sentence is found. Attention is called hy the state’s attorney with this court to the fact that there is no sufficient recognizance in the record. This contention of the state is also well taken. The recognizance that appears in the record states the name of no surety, and does not set out whether the offense charged is a felony or a misdemeanor, and does not state the time or place the recognizance binds the appellant to appear, nor the court before which…