Legal Opinion

United States v. Dorto

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided May 12, 1925No. 1808PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.

The agreed facts in this habeas corpus case show that the petitioner landed in New York on June 14, 1922, and was excluded because the Italian quota was full. She then instituted ha-beas corpus proceedings, which were dismissed. On appeal, she was bailed. Her appeal was dismissed April 25, 1923. Meantime, when free on bail she went to Providence, R. I., and there met Dorto, now her husband. Her present petition, filed on June 16, 1924, goes on the ground that there was a common-law marriage before the 'Cable Act (42 Stat. 1021 [Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, § 4358a et…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Love's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Odd Fellows' Beneficial Ass'n v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1892
  3. Williams v. HerrickSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1899

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cirulli v. LicataNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  2. United States ex rel. Markin v. CurranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
  3. Lamberti v. LambertiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. United States ex rel. Paolantonio v. DayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
  5. (SS) Lemke v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API